data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab431/ab4318d87ad1518964d0de6b78159728b2849346" alt=""
I think the three chapters about images of whales – chapters LV thru LVII – come at a pivitol point in this narrative disintegration. Melville has completely outlined the basic dramatic structure, & ruminated on the deepest mysteries inherent in the boredom of a three-year voyage, & now that that boredom has set in, eleven hours into a non-stop reading, he wields his long sentences to attack all those who can’t illustrate a whale correctly, the dorsal fin is in the wrong place, &c. I can’t help pitying those who are forced to read this in high school, weary after hours of algebra, physics, & whatever-else homework, & Melville is still ambling on about bones. I cannot imagine very few readers approaching these chapters with a proper mind to appreciate them. But when you come at them with a maturity, a postmodern distance, & perhaps that majestic tedium that being on a changeless ocean, or a train, or lying awake in a whaling museum non-stop on a cold tile floor, I think these chapters are really fucking funny.
But the placing of the cap-sheaf to all this blundering business was reserved for the scientific Frederick Cuvier, brother to the famous Baron. In, he published a Natural History of Whales,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b140/7b140d3196240e80ad86dba4729ef9ffa110f298" alt=""
-ch. LV, “Of the Mountrous Pictures of Whales”
On the train, with the cud-chewing & gentle rocking thru the Rockies, I thought of the post-Minimalist music I’ve been writing, inspired by the Bang-on-a-Canners, New York hipsters, a lot of it (both their’s & mine) quite boring, indifferently, with a lot of imprecise repetitions, a consistent texture, with the whole of notated Western music (along with popular & world musics) to draw from in reference, often ironically & in dense combination, but the pretension fully cohesive, destined to promote eye-rollings if the audience can actually pay attention. Well, at least the loose rhythms, (a lot of vague 2s & 3s to create a rhythmless, improvisatory atmosphere, like in David Lang’s Little Eye), feel somewhat aquatic, rocking, like a road-trip movie. The modernists found Melville relevant, & fully revived him in the ’20s, & there he’s sat at both the foundation & margins of American art; & then the postmodernists re-found him, & I’m sure I’m not the first to find a relation between the marginalized 21st-century hipster-ass classical music (which is a sort of genre-less post-postmodernism, often self-aware at its own self-awareness), & the deepest ambiguities in Melville’s narrative voice. I gave my piece a dose of the Americana harmonies, reminiscent of Copland & Ives, kept the rhythms in those swaying 2s & 3s of David Lang, but the voice is Melville’s.
1 comment:
Matthew Barney is pouring over whales and love, too.
Post a Comment